Primary Source Analysis
Learn
Primary source analysis is a foundational skill for understanding government and economics. By examining original documents, speeches, legislation, and data from the time period being studied, you can form your own interpretations rather than relying solely on secondary interpretations.
What Are Primary Sources?
Primary sources are original, firsthand accounts or evidence created during the time period under investigation. In government and economics, these include:
- Founding Documents: The Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Federalist Papers, and state constitutions
- Legislative Records: Bills, laws, congressional debates, committee reports, and voting records
- Executive Documents: Executive orders, presidential speeches, State of the Union addresses, and policy memoranda
- Judicial Opinions: Supreme Court decisions, dissenting opinions, and lower court rulings
- Economic Data: Census records, Bureau of Labor Statistics reports, Federal Reserve publications, and trade data
- Political Correspondence: Letters, diaries, and personal papers of political figures
The SOAPS Method
When analyzing any primary source, apply the SOAPS framework:
- S - Speaker: Who created this document? What was their position, background, and potential biases?
- O - Occasion: When and where was this created? What historical context shaped it?
- A - Audience: Who was the intended audience? How might this have influenced the content?
- P - Purpose: Why was this document created? What was the author trying to achieve?
- S - Subject: What is the main topic or argument? What claims are being made?
Evaluating Source Reliability
Not all primary sources are equally reliable. Consider these factors:
- Proximity: How close was the author to the events described?
- Corroboration: Do other sources support or contradict this account?
- Bias: What personal, political, or economic interests might have influenced the author?
- Completeness: Does the source tell the whole story, or is it partial?
Connecting to Constitutional Interpretation
Primary source analysis is essential for understanding constitutional debates. Different interpretive approaches include:
- Originalism: Interpreting the Constitution based on the original intent of the framers, requiring analysis of Federalist Papers, Constitutional Convention notes, and contemporary writings
- Living Constitution: Viewing the Constitution as evolving with society, using primary sources to trace how interpretations have changed over time
- Textualism: Focusing on the plain meaning of constitutional text, requiring close reading of the document itself
Examples
Example 1: Analyzing Federalist No. 10
Source Excerpt: "The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man... A zeal for different opinions concerning religion, concerning government, and many other points... an attachment to different leaders ambitiously contending for pre-eminence and power... have divided mankind into parties."
SOAPS Analysis:
- Speaker: James Madison, writing under the pseudonym "Publius." Madison was a Virginia delegate and key architect of the Constitution.
- Occasion: Published November 22, 1787, during the ratification debates. The Constitution had been drafted but not yet adopted.
- Audience: New York citizens, particularly those deciding whether to support ratification.
- Purpose: To persuade readers that a large republic with proper structures could control the dangers of faction better than small democracies.
- Subject: The nature of factions and how republican government can manage their effects without eliminating liberty.
Example 2: Analyzing Economic Data
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Situation Report, showing unemployment rate changes over 12 months.
Analysis Approach:
- Identify the data source: BLS is a federal agency that collects data through surveys of households and businesses.
- Understand methodology: The unemployment rate measures people actively seeking work as a percentage of the labor force.
- Consider limitations: The rate does not count discouraged workers who have stopped looking, or underemployed part-time workers.
- Contextualize: Compare to historical averages, consider seasonal adjustments, and examine related indicators like labor force participation.
Example 3: Analyzing a Supreme Court Opinion
Source Excerpt from McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): "Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the constitution, are constitutional."
Analysis:
- Speaker: Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court.
- Legal Question: Whether Congress had the power to establish a national bank, and whether Maryland could tax it.
- Key Interpretation: Marshall established the doctrine of implied powers, reading the Necessary and Proper Clause broadly.
- Historical Impact: This decision expanded federal power and remains foundational for constitutional interpretation.
Practice
Apply your primary source analysis skills to the following questions.
1. Read the following excerpt from President Franklin D. Roosevelt's First Inaugural Address (1933): "The only thing we have to fear is fear itselfânameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance."
What was Roosevelt's primary purpose in making this statement?
2. A historian finds a letter from a 19th-century factory owner describing excellent working conditions and high worker satisfaction. What is the most important consideration when evaluating this source?
3. Which of the following would be considered a primary source for studying the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
4. An economist is studying the causes of the 2008 financial crisis. Which primary source would provide the most direct evidence about mortgage lending practices?
5. When analyzing the Federalist Papers to understand the framers' intent regarding federalism, what limitation should a researcher acknowledge?
6. A Supreme Court justice cites the Constitutional Convention debates to support their interpretation of the Second Amendment. This approach is most consistent with which interpretive philosophy?
7. Examine this data point: "In 1932, the U.S. unemployment rate reached 23.6%." To fully understand this statistic as a primary source, which additional information would be most valuable?
8. A researcher finds two primary sources about the same economic event: a government press release and an internal memo from the same agency written on the same day. The memo contains different figures than the press release. What should the researcher conclude?
9. Which question would best help a student evaluate the reliability of a political speech as a primary source?
10. A student is analyzing President Nixon's resignation speech. The student notes that Nixon spoke about the need to focus on the nation's healing rather than his own legal situation. This observation primarily relates to which element of the SOAPS method?
Check Your Understanding
Key Concept Review 1: What is the difference between a primary source and a secondary source?
Show Answer
A primary source is an original document, artifact, or data created during the time period being studied (e.g., the Constitution, a presidential speech, census data). A secondary source interprets, analyzes, or comments on primary sources (e.g., a history textbook, a documentary, a scholarly analysis).
Key Concept Review 2: Why is it important to consider an author's potential biases when analyzing a primary source?
Show Answer
Authors may have personal, political, economic, or social interests that influence how they present information. Recognizing potential biases helps readers evaluate the reliability of the source and understand why certain information may be emphasized, minimized, or omitted. This does not mean biased sources are uselessâthey remain valuable evidence when their limitations are understood.
Key Concept Review 3: How does corroboration strengthen historical analysis?
Show Answer
Corroboration involves comparing multiple sources to verify information. When independent sources agree on key facts, the evidence is stronger. When sources disagree, researchers must investigate why and determine which accounts are more reliable. This process helps establish a more accurate understanding of historical events.
Next Steps
- Practice analyzing primary sources from the National Archives website
- Read original Supreme Court opinions rather than just summaries
- Examine economic data directly from sources like FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)
- Continue to the next lesson on Maps and Data interpretation