Grade: Grade 10 Subject: SAT/ACT Skills Unit: Timed Modules SAT: Information+Ideas, Craft+Structure ACT: Reading

Timed Reading Practice

Learn

Timed reading practice is essential for SAT and ACT success. Both tests require you to read passages and answer questions under significant time pressure. This module will help you develop the pacing skills, strategic reading techniques, and time management abilities needed to maximize your score on test day.

Test Timing Overview

SAT Reading & Writing: Two 32-minute modules with approximately 27 questions each. That's roughly 1 minute and 11 seconds per question, including reading time.

ACT Reading: 35 minutes for 4 passages with 10 questions each (40 questions total). That's approximately 8 minutes and 45 seconds per passage, or about 52 seconds per question.

Time Management Strategies

The Two-Pass Strategy

On your first pass through a section, answer the questions you find easiest first. Mark difficult questions and return to them on your second pass. This ensures you capture all the "easy points" before spending time on challenging questions.

1. Active Reading Under Time Pressure

When time is limited, you cannot read every word at the same pace. Instead, use strategic reading techniques:

  • Preview the questions first: Quickly scan the questions (not answer choices) to know what information you need to find
  • Read the first and last sentences of each paragraph carefully: These typically contain the main ideas
  • Skim the middle sections: Look for key terms, names, dates, and transition words
  • Mark key information: Underline or note important details as you read

2. Pacing Benchmarks

Use these benchmarks to check your pace during practice:

SAT Pacing Guide

  • Short passages (50-100 words): 30-45 seconds to read, 30-45 seconds to answer
  • Medium passages (100-150 words): 45-60 seconds to read, 45-60 seconds to answer
  • Paired passages or longer texts: 60-90 seconds to read, 45-60 seconds to answer

Check your time at the halfway point (about 16 minutes). You should have completed approximately 13-14 questions.

ACT Pacing Guide

  • Target time per passage: 8-9 minutes total (reading + all 10 questions)
  • Reading time: 2.5-3 minutes per passage
  • Questions: 30-35 seconds per question

Check your time after each passage. After 2 passages, you should have about 17-18 minutes remaining.

3. Question Attack Strategies

Different question types require different approaches:

Question Type Time Strategy Approach
Main Idea Fast (30-45 sec) Answer based on your initial reading; don't re-read the whole passage
Detail/Evidence Medium (45-60 sec) Use line references or key words to locate specific information
Inference Medium-Slow (45-75 sec) Find the relevant section, then reason from the text
Vocabulary in Context Fast (30-45 sec) Substitute each answer choice into the sentence
Purpose/Function Medium (45-60 sec) Consider the paragraph's role in the overall passage

4. When to Guess and Move On

Knowing when to guess is crucial for time management:

  • The 90-second rule: If you've spent more than 90 seconds on a question without progress, make an educated guess and move on
  • Eliminate first: Even if you must guess, eliminate obviously wrong answers first to improve your odds
  • Mark and return: If time permits, return to marked questions after completing the section
  • Never leave blanks: There's no penalty for wrong answers on the SAT or ACT

The Elimination Advantage

Random guessing gives you a 25% chance (1 in 4). Eliminating just one wrong answer improves your odds to 33%. Eliminating two wrong answers gives you a 50% chance. Even partial knowledge significantly improves your expected score.

5. Building Reading Speed

Reading speed can be improved with practice:

  • Daily timed reading: Practice reading articles or passages for 5-10 minutes daily with a timer
  • Reduce subvocalization: Try to see groups of words rather than "speaking" each word in your head
  • Expand your peripheral vision: Practice taking in more words per eye fixation
  • Read challenging material: Scientific journals, classic literature, and historical documents build comprehension speed

Examples

Work through these timed examples to practice your pacing. For each example, try to complete the reading and question within the target time.

Example 1: Short Passage - Main Idea (Target: 75 seconds total)

Start your timer now.

The discovery of deep-sea hydrothermal vents in 1977 fundamentally changed our understanding of where life can exist. Scientists had long believed that all life on Earth ultimately depended on sunlight for energy. The vent ecosystems, however, are powered entirely by chemical energy from the Earth's interior. Bacteria at these vents use hydrogen sulfide to produce energy through chemosynthesis, forming the base of a food chain that includes giant tube worms, eyeless shrimp, and other organisms found nowhere else on our planet. This discovery has profound implications for the search for extraterrestrial life, suggesting that living organisms might exist in dark environments throughout the solar system.

Question: Which of the following best states the main idea of the passage?

  1. Hydrothermal vents were discovered in 1977 by marine scientists
  2. The discovery of vent ecosystems expanded our understanding of where life can exist
  3. Giant tube worms and eyeless shrimp live near hydrothermal vents
  4. Chemosynthesis is more efficient than photosynthesis for producing energy
Show Solution

Answer: B

Time check: You should have finished in about 75 seconds (45 seconds reading, 30 seconds answering).

Explanation: The passage's central argument is that the discovery of hydrothermal vents changed how we understand life's requirements. Option A is just a detail. Option C mentions specific organisms but misses the main point. Option D makes a comparison not supported by the passage. Option B captures the passage's core message about expanding our understanding of where life can exist.

Speed tip: For main idea questions, focus on the first and last sentences. The first sentence introduces the topic (vent discovery changed our understanding), and the last sentence reinforces it (implications for finding life elsewhere).

Example 2: Detail Question with Line Reference (Target: 60 seconds)

Start your timer now.

The concept of "rewilding" has gained significant attention among conservation biologists in recent decades. Unlike traditional conservation, which often focuses on preserving existing ecosystems in a static state, rewilding aims to restore natural processes by reintroducing species that have been lost from an area. Proponents argue that large predators, in particular, play crucial roles in regulating ecosystems. The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park in 1995 is frequently cited as a rewilding success story. Within years of the wolves' return, the park's ecosystem showed remarkable changes: elk populations became more mobile, allowing vegetation along riverbanks to recover, which in turn stabilized stream channels and created new habitats for fish and songbirds.

Question: According to the passage, what distinguishes rewilding from traditional conservation?

  1. Rewilding focuses exclusively on protecting large predators
  2. Traditional conservation costs less than rewilding programs
  3. Rewilding seeks to restore natural processes rather than maintain static ecosystems
  4. Traditional conservation has been more successful in protecting wildlife
Show Solution

Answer: C

Time check: This question should take about 60 seconds because the comparison is explicitly stated in the passage.

Explanation: The second sentence directly contrasts the two approaches: "Unlike traditional conservation, which often focuses on preserving existing ecosystems in a static state, rewilding aims to restore natural processes." This directly supports answer C.

Speed tip: For detail questions with comparisons, look for contrast words like "unlike," "however," "but," or "whereas." These signal where the answer is located.

Example 3: Inference Question (Target: 90 seconds)

Start your timer now.

In the early twentieth century, the American automobile industry faced a challenge that threatened its growth: cars were simply too expensive for average workers to afford. Henry Ford's solution was not merely technical innovation but a reimagining of the relationship between production and consumption. By dramatically increasing wages at his factories to five dollars per day in 1914 - more than double the prevailing rate - Ford ensured that his own workers could afford to buy the cars they produced. Critics initially derided the policy as "economic blundering," but Ford understood something his competitors did not: mass production requires mass consumption, and mass consumption requires workers with sufficient income to become consumers.

Question: The passage implies that Ford's critics failed to understand which of the following?

  1. Technical innovations in automobile manufacturing
  2. The connection between wages and consumer demand
  3. How to produce automobiles more efficiently
  4. The importance of worker satisfaction in factories
Show Solution

Answer: B

Time check: Inference questions typically take longer (75-90 seconds) because you must reason beyond what's explicitly stated.

Explanation: The passage states that critics called Ford's wage policy "economic blundering," but then explains that "Ford understood something his competitors did not: mass production requires mass consumption, and mass consumption requires workers with sufficient income to become consumers." The critics missed this connection between paying workers well (wages) and creating a market for goods (consumer demand).

Speed tip: For inference questions, look for what the passage suggests rather than states outright. Find the relevant section, then ask "what must be true based on this information?"

Example 4: Vocabulary in Context (Target: 45 seconds)

Start your timer now.

The museum's new exhibition takes a critical look at nineteenth-century landscape painting, examining how artists' depictions of nature often served political and economic interests rather than simply documenting the natural world. The curators argue that many celebrated wilderness scenes were carefully constructed to promote western expansion and justify the displacement of indigenous peoples.

Question: As used in the passage, "critical" most nearly means

  1. crucial or essential
  2. disapproving or negative
  3. analytical and evaluative
  4. urgent or immediate
Show Solution

Answer: C

Time check: Vocabulary questions should be among your fastest (30-45 seconds).

Explanation: In this context, "critical" describes an approach that examines and evaluates the paintings' purposes. The exhibition isn't simply crucial (A) or disapproving (B) or urgent (D) - it's analytical, looking beneath the surface to understand hidden meanings and motivations.

Speed tip: Substitute each answer choice into the sentence. "The museum's exhibition takes an analytical and evaluative look at nineteenth-century landscape painting" makes the most sense in context.

Example 5: Purpose/Function Question (Target: 75 seconds)

Start your timer now.

Many people assume that deserts are barren wastelands, devoid of life. This perception could not be further from the truth. Desert ecosystems are home to an astonishing diversity of life forms that have evolved remarkable adaptations to survive in extreme conditions. The kangaroo rat, for instance, can survive its entire life without ever drinking water, obtaining all necessary moisture from the seeds it eats. Desert plants like the saguaro cactus can store hundreds of gallons of water, allowing them to survive years of drought. These adaptations remind us that life finds a way to flourish even in the most challenging environments.

Question: The author mentions the kangaroo rat and saguaro cactus primarily to

  1. compare animal and plant survival strategies
  2. argue that deserts should receive more environmental protection
  3. provide specific examples of desert adaptations
  4. explain the scientific process of studying desert ecosystems
Show Solution

Answer: C

Time check: Purpose questions require understanding how details support the main idea (60-75 seconds).

Explanation: The passage's main point is that deserts contain diverse life with "remarkable adaptations." The kangaroo rat and saguaro cactus are mentioned as specific examples ("for instance") that illustrate these adaptations. The examples support the claim that "life finds a way to flourish even in the most challenging environments."

Speed tip: For purpose questions, ask "why did the author include this?" Examples typically illustrate, support, or clarify a point made elsewhere in the passage.

Practice

Complete this timed practice section. Set a timer for 13 minutes to answer all 10 questions based on the following passage. This simulates the pace needed for the SAT Reading & Writing section.

Practice Instructions

  1. Set a timer for 13 minutes
  2. Read the passage first (target: 3 minutes)
  3. Answer all 10 questions (target: 1 minute each)
  4. If you finish early, review your answers
  5. If time runs out, note which question you're on

Passage: The Psychology of Decision-Making

Traditional economic theory assumes that humans are rational actors who carefully weigh costs and benefits before making decisions. This model of "homo economicus" - the perfectly rational human - has guided policy-making and business strategy for generations. However, research by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in the 1970s and 1980s revealed that actual human decision-making is far messier and more predictable in its irrationality.

Kahneman and Tversky identified numerous cognitive biases that systematically distort human judgment. One of their most significant discoveries was "loss aversion" - the finding that people feel the pain of losing something about twice as strongly as they feel the pleasure of gaining something of equivalent value. This explains why investors often hold onto losing stocks too long (unwilling to "realize" the loss) while selling winning stocks too quickly (eager to "lock in" the gain). It also explains why people are often unwilling to trade items they own for objectively better alternatives - a phenomenon known as the "endowment effect."

Another crucial insight from their research concerns how the framing of a choice affects decisions. When medical treatments are described in terms of survival rates, patients and doctors choose differently than when the same treatments are described in terms of mortality rates - even though the information is mathematically identical. A treatment with a "90% survival rate" sounds more appealing than one with a "10% mortality rate," despite these being exactly the same thing. This susceptibility to framing effects has profound implications for everything from medical communication to political campaigns.

Kahneman, who won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2002, later developed a framework distinguishing between two modes of thinking. "System 1" is fast, automatic, and intuitive - it allows us to recognize faces, complete simple sentences, and navigate familiar routes without conscious effort. "System 2" is slow, deliberate, and analytical - it's what we engage when solving complex math problems or carefully considering important decisions. Much of our daily behavior is governed by System 1, which is efficient but prone to the biases identified in Kahneman and Tversky's earlier research.

Critics of behavioral economics argue that laboratory experiments may not reflect real-world decision-making and that people often do behave rationally when the stakes are high enough. Defenders respond that even high-stakes decisions - buying homes, choosing careers, planning for retirement - show consistent evidence of cognitive biases. Indeed, some of our most important decisions may be especially vulnerable to bias because they involve uncertainty, complexity, and emotional significance.

The practical applications of this research continue to expand. "Nudge theory," developed by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein, applies behavioral insights to policy design. By understanding how people actually make decisions, rather than how they theoretically should, policymakers can design choices that guide people toward better outcomes while preserving freedom of choice. For example, making retirement savings plans opt-out rather than opt-in dramatically increases participation rates, since inertia (a cognitive bias toward maintaining the status quo) works in savers' favor rather than against them.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

  1. argue that traditional economic theory should be abandoned
  2. explain how research on cognitive biases has changed our understanding of decision-making
  3. describe the careers of Kahneman and Tversky in detail
  4. compare System 1 and System 2 thinking

2. According to the passage, "loss aversion" refers to the tendency for people to

  1. avoid making any decisions that involve risk
  2. experience losses more intensely than equivalent gains
  3. prefer trading items they own for better alternatives
  4. hold onto winning investments longer than they should

3. The example of treatments described in terms of "survival rates" versus "mortality rates" is used to illustrate

  1. how doctors often mislead patients about treatment options
  2. the importance of mathematical literacy in healthcare
  3. how the presentation of information affects choices even when content is identical
  4. why patients should always seek second opinions before treatment

4. As used in paragraph 4, "deliberate" most nearly means

  1. intentional
  2. careful and thoughtful
  3. slow-moving
  4. decisive

5. Based on the passage, which of the following would Kahneman most likely describe as a System 1 process?

  1. Calculating a restaurant tip
  2. Deciding which college to attend
  3. Recognizing a friend's voice on the phone
  4. Comparing mortgage rates

6. The passage indicates that critics of behavioral economics believe that

  1. Kahneman and Tversky's research methods were fundamentally flawed
  2. cognitive biases may be less influential in real-world situations
  3. Nobel Prizes should not be awarded for psychology research
  4. System 2 thinking is more common than behavioral economists suggest

7. The author's attitude toward behavioral economics research can best be described as

  1. dismissive and skeptical
  2. neutral and uncertain
  3. informative and generally favorable
  4. enthusiastic but critical

8. According to the passage, opt-out retirement savings plans are more effective than opt-in plans because

  1. they offer higher interest rates to participants
  2. they harness people's tendency to maintain the status quo
  3. they are required by federal law
  4. they appeal to System 2 analytical thinking

9. The passage suggests that cognitive biases may be especially likely to affect

  1. simple, routine decisions made frequently
  2. decisions that are uncertain, complex, and emotionally significant
  3. choices made by trained economists and policymakers
  4. laboratory experiments rather than real-world situations

10. Which choice provides the best evidence for the idea that traditional economic assumptions about human rationality are flawed?

  1. The concept of "homo economicus" has guided policy for generations
  2. Kahneman won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2002
  3. Investors often hold losing stocks too long while selling winners too quickly
  4. Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein developed "nudge theory"
Show Answer Key

1. B - The passage explains how cognitive bias research changed understanding of decision-making

2. B - Loss aversion is defined as feeling losses about twice as strongly as equivalent gains

3. C - The framing example shows how presentation affects choices even with identical information

4. B - In context, "deliberate" describes careful, thoughtful analysis (System 2)

5. C - Recognizing a voice is automatic and intuitive, fitting System 1's description

6. B - Critics argue lab results may not reflect real-world behavior

7. C - The author presents research informatively with a generally positive view of its applications

8. B - Opt-out plans work because inertia (status quo bias) keeps people enrolled

9. B - The passage states important decisions with uncertainty and emotion "may be especially vulnerable"

10. C - The investor behavior is a concrete example showing people don't act rationally

Timing Analysis

If you finished in under 13 minutes: Excellent pacing! You're on track for the SAT.

If you finished in 13-15 minutes: Close! Practice to shave off 1-2 minutes.

If you took more than 15 minutes: Focus on reading speed and the two-pass strategy.

Check Your Understanding

Answer these questions about timed reading strategies.

1. What is the "two-pass strategy" and when should you use it?

Show Answer

The two-pass strategy involves answering easier questions first, marking difficult ones, and returning to them later. Use it when you encounter questions that are taking too long - rather than getting stuck, move on and come back after you've captured the "easy points."

2. How long should you spend on a single question before guessing and moving on?

Show Answer

The 90-second rule suggests that if you've spent more than 90 seconds on a question without making progress, you should make an educated guess and move on. Before guessing, eliminate obviously wrong answers to improve your odds.

3. What are the key differences between SAT and ACT reading section timing?

Show Answer

The SAT Reading & Writing section has two 32-minute modules with about 27 questions each (roughly 71 seconds per question including reading). The ACT Reading section has 35 minutes for 4 passages with 40 total questions (about 8.75 minutes per passage or 52 seconds per question). The ACT is slightly more time-pressured per question.

4. Why is it advantageous to eliminate wrong answers even if you're not sure of the right answer?

Show Answer

Elimination improves your odds significantly. Random guessing gives a 25% chance (1 in 4). Eliminating one wrong answer improves odds to 33% (1 in 3). Eliminating two wrong answers gives a 50% chance (1 in 2). Since there's no penalty for wrong answers on the SAT or ACT, even partial elimination with guessing helps your expected score.

Next Steps

  • Practice daily: Do at least one timed passage per day to build reading speed and stamina
  • Track your timing: Note how long different question types take you and focus on your slowest areas
  • Review strategically: When reviewing practice tests, analyze why you missed questions - was it a time issue or a comprehension issue?
  • Continue to Timed Math Practice to develop pacing skills for quantitative sections
  • Review Reading Question Types if you need more practice with specific question formats
  • Return to the Domain Practice section for targeted skill building